Comments on: The Billy Meier Affair – Wedding Cake Edition

By: BillyJoe7

BillyJoe7 — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:59:53 +0000

I don’t know, I didn’t see anything fake about those kitttens.
Unlike tmac’s video which is amazing but an obvious fake.
And your UFO videos….;)

By: Judy1

Judy1 — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:10:45 +0000

tmac57 – yeah that was amazing, but have you seen this?

http://youtu.be/2CNd6OGdMO8

By: tmac57

tmac57 — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:44:01 +0000

Judy1- You think that’s impressive? Then take a look at this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBvUBQWK0w4&feature=player_embedded

Believing is seeing.

By: Judy1

Judy1 — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:02:38 +0000

Yeah, sorry tmac57. I have a bit of a downer on US censorship at the mo, which is obviously clouding my judgement.

You may be surprised, but derekcbart (luckily for us here at Neurologica) is the very guy who is best qualified to answer that original question.

http://youtu.be/EIe4VMtCREo

By: tmac57

tmac57 — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:07:57 +0000

Judy-I didn’t realize that The Economist was published in the US.

By: BillyJoe7

BillyJoe7 — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:40:18 +0000

nybgrus, I see what you mean.

By: Judy1

Judy1 — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:01:20 +0000

nybgrus I’m a Troll? … how rude.

By: nybgrus

nybgrus — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:54:05 +0000

she’s gotta be a troll BJ.

But then again I can’t really wrap my head around people who truly believe in their religion of choice so who am I to judge?

By: Judy1

Judy1 — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:21:02 +0000

BillyJoe7 It must be nice living in your world where governments withhold nothing from their citizens (subjects), there are no conspiracies and anyone who sees things differently is instantly dismissed as logically fallacious.

http://www.howcropcirclesaremade.com

By: BillyJoe7

BillyJoe7 — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:32:43 +0000

Judy,

My apologies.
I thought you were joking.
(Poe’s Corollary )

“Surely a CGI faker wouldn’t know, wouldn’t care, and so wouldn’t bother with such minutiae.”

All you need is just one faker who does know, does care, and can be bothered.

“why bother replicating the very motions of a Wedding Cake Beamship”

This is an example of the logical fallacy called question begging:
In your explanation, you are assuming your conclusion – your conclusion being that there is something called a Wedding Cake Beamship. You can’t do that. There may be no Wedding Cake Beamships and all the videos could be fakes.