<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Music and Brain Plasticity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Fix of Neuroscience, Skepticism, and Critical Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazeedt</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24338</link>
		<dc:creator>mazeedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24338</guid>
		<description>Actually, looking back I understand where you think that I am saying that, however the emotional colouring that we were talking about was the content/syntax independent emotional colouring in speech that is  similar to music, i.e. tone of voice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, looking back I understand where you think that I am saying that, however the emotional colouring that we were talking about was the content/syntax independent emotional colouring in speech that is  similar to music, i.e. tone of voice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazeedt</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24336</link>
		<dc:creator>mazeedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24336</guid>
		<description>And I know that you basically concede the point made in the first new response, then again I never disagreed with what you said either...
Except possibly your first comment about my comment XD
Mostly because I think that it is a pretty strange objection...., to that point though, tone of  voice does not carry over to written communication unless you specificly point it out. However, I never said that this means that written speech has no emotional colouring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I know that you basically concede the point made in the first new response, then again I never disagreed with what you said either&#8230;<br />
Except possibly your first comment about my comment XD<br />
Mostly because I think that it is a pretty strange objection&#8230;., to that point though, tone of  voice does not carry over to written communication unless you specificly point it out. However, I never said that this means that written speech has no emotional colouring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazeedt</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24334</link>
		<dc:creator>mazeedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24334</guid>
		<description>The rest of what you said was a long boring speech of &quot;captain obvious approves this message&quot;
No offense intended by the way, just feeling a little grumpy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rest of what you said was a long boring speech of &#8220;captain obvious approves this message&#8221;<br />
No offense intended by the way, just feeling a little grumpy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazeedt</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24333</link>
		<dc:creator>mazeedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24333</guid>
		<description>Besides it was you who commented on my post not the other way around, I did not comment on any points that you were trying to make but on that I thought that you had misinterpreted my comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides it was you who commented on my post not the other way around, I did not comment on any points that you were trying to make but on that I thought that you had misinterpreted my comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazeedt</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24332</link>
		<dc:creator>mazeedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24332</guid>
		<description>Fifi
I disagree I think that there is a genuine difference in the amount of emotional information that you can accurately convey with written and spoken communication and I think that this is quite obvious. If I had said this sentence to you it would have been immediately obvious to you that I was annoyed (unless you were autistik) because of the way I said it. On the other hand there is no way of unambiguously tell that from the first paragraph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifi<br />
I disagree I think that there is a genuine difference in the amount of emotional information that you can accurately convey with written and spoken communication and I think that this is quite obvious. If I had said this sentence to you it would have been immediately obvious to you that I was annoyed (unless you were autistik) because of the way I said it. On the other hand there is no way of unambiguously tell that from the first paragraph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyJoe7</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24276</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyJoe7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24276</guid>
		<description>&quot;Because, BillyJoe7, the interaction will not just be with me, but with a moderator that actually did biology and actually does philosophy, and actually will get involved with the discussion, and actually show you, if you’re wrong, where you are wrong. &quot;

That will certainly be a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Because, BillyJoe7, the interaction will not just be with me, but with a moderator that actually did biology and actually does philosophy, and actually will get involved with the discussion, and actually show you, if you’re wrong, where you are wrong. &#8221;</p>
<p>That will certainly be a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyJoe7</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24275</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyJoe7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24275</guid>
		<description>If you give me a link, and promise to let the others speak without interference from you, I might check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you give me a link, and promise to let the others speak without interference from you, I might check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bindle</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-3/#comment-24243</link>
		<dc:creator>bindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24243</guid>
		<description>Fifi, Diana Deutsch has an article, Speaking in Tones, about how music and language are partners in the brain, in the new issue of Scientific American Mind that you should find interesting.
It&#039;s also found here:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=speaking-in-tones-jul10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifi, Diana Deutsch has an article, Speaking in Tones, about how music and language are partners in the brain, in the new issue of Scientific American Mind that you should find interesting.<br />
It&#8217;s also found here:<br />
<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=speaking-in-tones-jul10" rel="nofollow">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=speaking-in-tones-jul10</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fifi</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-2/#comment-24237</link>
		<dc:creator>Fifi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24237</guid>
		<description>That said, I&#039;m in no way denigrating or minimizing the power of sound to evoke and express emotion. I&#039;m just pointing out that the idea that the written word is neutral and doesn&#039;t or can&#039;t convey tone is erroneous. (Both music and words, together and apart, are powerful tools used for propagandistic purposes.) It&#039;s not all projection, novels and poetry are fine examples of how words and how they&#039;re structured (and their history/context) carry emotional weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That said, I&#8217;m in no way denigrating or minimizing the power of sound to evoke and express emotion. I&#8217;m just pointing out that the idea that the written word is neutral and doesn&#8217;t or can&#8217;t convey tone is erroneous. (Both music and words, together and apart, are powerful tools used for propagandistic purposes.) It&#8217;s not all projection, novels and poetry are fine examples of how words and how they&#8217;re structured (and their history/context) carry emotional weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fifi</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/music-and-brain-plasticity/comment-page-2/#comment-24235</link>
		<dc:creator>Fifi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2144#comment-24235</guid>
		<description>mazeedt - While that&#039;s true, I think you may also misunderstand my point. People project emotional content onto others all the time when listening (or not listening, which is probably more accurate) as well as when it&#039;s written. We all interpret what others say according to our own frames of reference. It&#039;s often just more obvious in written communication (just as it&#039;s often more obvious that one has incorrectly remembered or understood something if it&#039;s written down  because one can refer back to the original instead of one&#039;s already biased memory). My point was we project/contribute much of the emotional content of what others say as well as what they write because communication involves reception as well as broadcasting - it&#039;s not a  one way street, even at it&#039;s most didactic level the reader&#039;s context will influence their understanding. Communication is a two way street and language is very context specific - that includes the context of the listener. People often get it wrong when someone is speaking too, listening is not a neutral act and it generally takes a lot of practice  to be able to listen in a truly receptive way (and to detach from and  avoid projecting onto others...or to be aware of our projections more accurately...therapists learn how to do this if they&#039;re trained properly so they can see transference and countertransference).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mazeedt &#8211; While that&#8217;s true, I think you may also misunderstand my point. People project emotional content onto others all the time when listening (or not listening, which is probably more accurate) as well as when it&#8217;s written. We all interpret what others say according to our own frames of reference. It&#8217;s often just more obvious in written communication (just as it&#8217;s often more obvious that one has incorrectly remembered or understood something if it&#8217;s written down  because one can refer back to the original instead of one&#8217;s already biased memory). My point was we project/contribute much of the emotional content of what others say as well as what they write because communication involves reception as well as broadcasting &#8211; it&#8217;s not a  one way street, even at it&#8217;s most didactic level the reader&#8217;s context will influence their understanding. Communication is a two way street and language is very context specific &#8211; that includes the context of the listener. People often get it wrong when someone is speaking too, listening is not a neutral act and it generally takes a lot of practice  to be able to listen in a truly receptive way (and to detach from and  avoid projecting onto others&#8230;or to be aware of our projections more accurately&#8230;therapists learn how to do this if they&#8217;re trained properly so they can see transference and countertransference).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
