Mar 25 2008

Hubub Over Expelled

The promoters of anti-science like to turn reality on its head. The reason is simple: if your cherished beliefs do not fare well when seen through the prism of reality, then the problem is with reality – so just change it. Of course, you can’t change reality, but you can lie about. So the warriors of woo inevitably get sucked into spiraling deception.

Anyone who has dealt with creationists, or their latest incarnation – Intelligent Design proponents (or, as we call them, cdesign proponentsists – a reference to a copy-and-paste error in the book Of Pandas and People), has experienced spiraling deception first hand. Just read the Discovery Institute blog; it is more potent than a bottle of Ipecac.

The latest ID propaganda endeavor, the new movie Expelled featuring Ben Stein, is a good example of deception at work – both in its content and the hubub surrounding an early screening of the movie in Minnesota and some prominent scientists (Richard Dawkins and PZ Myers).

First the movie itself. Richard Dawkins screened the film and writes a review here, with his signature wit. Colorado Confidential has also written a review worth reading, pointing out some of the factual “errors” in the film. By all non-true-believer accounts, the movie is a turkey. It is long and boring and as a work of film it is a terrible hack job.

And of course they get the facts, the science, and the history all wrong. Much of the movie was tricking various evolutionists into saying statements that could later be misrepresented. Another large chunk was equating “Darwinists” with Nazis. This nonsense has been dispensed with numerous times in the past, but I guess we have to keep doing it. First, it is a non-sequitur even if true (that Hitler based some of his racist ideas on evolution). If a lunatic misunderstands and completely abuses a scientific theory, that is not any commentary at all on the scientific theory itself (just the lunatic) and says nothing about whether or not the theory is true. The Hitler connection is also largely not true -there is no evidence to suggest that Hitler’s anti-semitism, his political views, his ambitions, or the “final solution” in any way derived from evolutionary theory. At most he used his misconception of evolution to justify his ideas in retrospect.

Hitler also said:

I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. (Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 2)

So by the same logic we can use Hitler to impugn Christianity.

But the core of Expelled, and the claim from which it derives its title, is that Darwinists are ideologues who are oppressing anyone who holds a contrary view and are systematically repressing academic freedom, free speech, and any fair discussion of legitimate scientific skepticism of Darwin’s ideas. This is, in fact, the latest propaganda tactic of the ID crowd. It is also utter hogwash.

Creationists have long gone out of their way to misinterpret any statement by a scientist as to the high degree of confidence we have in the theory of evolution as dogma. Now this strategy has been expanded to argue that if an academic is criticized for making ignorant statements about evolution, then their free speech is being oppressed. If an academic displays scientific incompetence by making blatantly pseudoscientific statements or publishing abject nonsense, and their career fairly reflects this incompetence, then the ID crowd cries for “academic freedom.”

It’s all a deceitful dodge. The truth is the creationists/ID proponents do not like evolutionary theory because it conflicts with their ideological beliefs. They therefore are doing everything they can to make evolution controversial and keep it out of the schools, while inserting their religious views as science. Failing that they want their distortions and lies about evolution to be treated as if it were legitimate scientific discourse. ID is no more science than astrology, geocentrism, the expanding earth theory, or homeopathy. None of it has any place in the world of science, except as object lessons in pseudoscience.

But it is easy to portray issues that are fundamentally about standards of quality as if they were really about freedom and oppression. The public has a much easier time relating to issues of freedom, and in order to understand quality control in science and academia you have to understand science.

The shenanigans surrounding the pre-screening of Expelled represent well the deceptive nature of ID proponents. By now anyone who reads science blogs will have heard that PZ Myers was “Expelled from Expelled.” Here’s the short version: Myers signed up to view a screening of the movie, with his family and Richard Dawkins as guests. He did everything according to the rules, just like everyone else, but was pulled out of line and forced to leave the theater. Dawkins, whose name was not on the sign up list because he was a guest, was let in with the others to see the movie. At the end of the movie, during a Q&A, Dawkins got up to ask why Myers was expelled from the movie.

Let the prevarication begin.

Mathis, the producer of the film, and the ID lackies over at the Discovery Institute have told various lies about what happened and why.

- In response to Dawkins’ question, Mathis said that Myers was thrown out because the screening was by invitation only and he was not invited. This is not true – it was not by invitation and Myers did sign up online just like everyone else, using his real name. Then Mathis implied that PZ was being unruly (not true), and that he let Dawkins in because he was “honorable.” Now he is saying that “I banned pz because I want him to pay to see it. Nothing more.”

- Meanwhile, Bruce Chapman in the Discovery Institute blog has been putting his own ridiculous spin on events. He claims that Dawkins “crashed” the showing because he was not invited and did not have a ticket – neither of which were required.

- Chapman also claims that Mathis recognized Dawkins and let him in, and even introduced him at the end of the movie. Yet by Dawkins’ account Mathis had no idea he was there until Dawkins stood up and asked a question -which took Mathis by surprise.

The whole affair is an embarrassment to Mathis, the DI, Expelled, and ID apologists. It highlights what has always been apparent to me – they are all about propaganda and spin, not about serious scientific discourse.

Hopefully this affair will make this apparent to the public at large.

_____________________________________________

The National Center for Science Education has created a website dedicated to correcting the misinformation in the movie Expelled and linking to relevant resources.

http://www.expelledexposed.com/

Share

12 responses so far

12 Responses to “Hubub Over Expelled”

  1. ellazimmon 25 Mar 2008 at 8:55 am

    One thing that particularly galls me is that some of the ID supporters haven’t even read some of the opposing views about this incident although many of the ID blogs are allowing many more dissenting posts than normal. I think the necessity of soliciting and addressing contrary opinions is one lesson that many of the true believers never quite absorb along with the basic requirement of critically examining all claims.

    Anyway, you’re being admirably polite, Dr Steve, as usual. I can’t wait to here the Rogues’ take on this one!

  2. Steve Pageon 25 Mar 2008 at 10:31 am

    This is hilarious, tragic and utterly typical of the IDiots. My only worry is that this publicity gives oxygen to a film that would die of natural causes if ignored.

  3. Physicaliston 25 Mar 2008 at 1:34 pm

    Yes, that gave me one of the best laughs I’ve had in a long time. I mean, we all know they’re not the brightest bulbs in the bunch — but aren’t they supposed to be savvy? To pull such an ironic and moronic move . . . I still chuckle. (“All we want is for scientists to pay attention to what we say!!” Yeah, right!)

    There’s a really funny side-note to all this pointed out by ERV

    #1Dont you feel really bad for the Fundie sitting next to Dawkins in the theater, though? Like sitting down to watch a scary movie. You finally figure out who the murderer is. Its the guy sitting next to you in the theater.
    ROFL!

  4. eiskrystalon 25 Mar 2008 at 5:29 pm

    What i most love about this incident is the fact that the usual propaganda techniques that are automatically applied regardless of circumstance have backfired so amusingly this time. There is no subtlety in their actions, they have merely done what worked last time. They are spin doctors and all they have is lie-spin, therefore…that is what they do…
    It tells a great deal about the kind of minds that you are working against when a failure like this happens.

    I hope you guys are making notes because this probably won’t happen again.

  5. Jim Shaveron 26 Mar 2008 at 12:01 am

    Hmmm. Throwing a real scientist out of the theater, in the presence of his family, while simultaneously within the theater thanking the very same scientist in the film’s credits for his gracious participation in an ideologically biased, anti-scientific documentary for which the real scientist’s participation was in fact obtained through trickery…

    Sounds a lot like CoS tactics to me.

    … by any means necessary.”

    I wonder if these guys read L. Ron’s “Fair Game” policy.

  6. DevilsAdvocateon 26 Mar 2008 at 1:12 pm

    Has anyone heard/read of any comment on this hilarious episode from Ben Stein?

    Ben Stein a creationist. Greta Van Susteren a Scientologist. What’s next? Do we learn that Walter Cronkite was a Pleidian? Dan Rather a Wiccan?

    The best way to refute a creationist?

    Let him speak.

  7. Jim Shaveron 26 Mar 2008 at 4:43 pm

    Regarding:

    Has anyone heard/read of any comment on this hilarious episode from Ben Stein?

    Anyone…?
    Anyone…?

    Anyone…?

  8. markVAon 26 Mar 2008 at 10:22 pm

    I’m curious as to anyone’s opinion on whether the makers of ‘Expelled’ are lying to the viewer or to themselves. Given how easily we can overlook or ignore uncomfortable aspects of the world, maybe the distortions are merely a translation of scientific theory through the ears of a denier, the real argument muffled b/c yo hands are over yo ears.

    Just curious musings, but it would be good to get a handle on to what extent the problem is deceit and/or foolishness

  9. Steve Pageon 27 Mar 2008 at 4:35 am

    They’re liars. They persuaded their respectable contributors (e.g. PZ, Dawkins) to contribute by stating that they were making an even-handed film about evolution and ID by the name of “Crossroads”; however, before they were interviewed, the makers had already registered the net domain http://www.expelledthemovie.com , which indicates that there never was a “Crossroads”. Given the heavy-handed anti-science propaganda piece that they created, I find it to be implausible that they are caught up in self-deception; their ability to bend the truth to fit their intent suggests that they are actively dishonest. Lying for Jesus, I believe Dawkins calls it.

  10. Steven Novellaon 27 Mar 2008 at 6:47 am

    aj,

    Creationism/ID is not sincere viable scientific arguments against evolutionary theory. It is, rather, an untestable belief system combined with false arguments against evolution – arguments that have been countered numerous times. But the creationists are not engaged in a scientific discussion – just propaganda.

    Spin and propaganda does not equal a conspiracy theory. It’s just politics.

    Bringing up eugenics is absurd. It has nothing to do with the scientific validity of evolution. Also, “priorities” has nothing to do with scientific truth. In science you don’t get to decide what you want to be true.

    And – all theories are incomplete. That is the nature of science. It doesn’t mean we should have geocentrists teaching abject nonsense in or schools.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.