<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cold Fusion After 20 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Fix of Neuroscience, Skepticism, and Critical Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHC</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-11356</link>
		<dc:creator>HHC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-11356</guid>
		<description>CBS 60 Minutes broadcast a story entitled Cold Fusion is Hot Again produced by Denise Cetta.  They interviewed Drs. McKubre, Fleischman, Garwin, and a Missouri scientist from the American Physical Society.  A DARPA memo was publicly released stating the anomalous excess heat has been produced by cold fusion.  CBS stated researchers have found an excess of 25 times the heat going into the cold fusion process.  McKubre talked about his work at SRI laboratories with Navy contracts/defense contracts.  He simply explained the process.  Enclosing and insulating palladium. deuterium, D2O like sea water, and using an electric current.  He explained basic measurements are taken, current, voltage, resistance...  What is obtained is fusion like the sun without the radiation. McKubre stated the variation in experimentation is due to palladium preparation.   The scientist from the American Physical Society visited an Israeli lab and he is now excited about the research which he thought was dead pseudoscience form years back.  Dr.Fleischman stated he regretted the original press conference which was insisted upon by the University of Utah.  He also wished he had called it something other than fusion, his competitors term.  Of course, Dr. Garwin will doubt cold fusion because he assisted with the hydrogen bomb known for hot fusion.  The American Physical Society representative requests that you read the published work on cold fusion, talk to the scientists, and use your own mind!  This was an excellent 20 minutes about science on television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS 60 Minutes broadcast a story entitled Cold Fusion is Hot Again produced by Denise Cetta.  They interviewed Drs. McKubre, Fleischman, Garwin, and a Missouri scientist from the American Physical Society.  A DARPA memo was publicly released stating the anomalous excess heat has been produced by cold fusion.  CBS stated researchers have found an excess of 25 times the heat going into the cold fusion process.  McKubre talked about his work at SRI laboratories with Navy contracts/defense contracts.  He simply explained the process.  Enclosing and insulating palladium. deuterium, D2O like sea water, and using an electric current.  He explained basic measurements are taken, current, voltage, resistance&#8230;  What is obtained is fusion like the sun without the radiation. McKubre stated the variation in experimentation is due to palladium preparation.   The scientist from the American Physical Society visited an Israeli lab and he is now excited about the research which he thought was dead pseudoscience form years back.  Dr.Fleischman stated he regretted the original press conference which was insisted upon by the University of Utah.  He also wished he had called it something other than fusion, his competitors term.  Of course, Dr. Garwin will doubt cold fusion because he assisted with the hydrogen bomb known for hot fusion.  The American Physical Society representative requests that you read the published work on cold fusion, talk to the scientists, and use your own mind!  This was an excellent 20 minutes about science on television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-11242</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-11242</guid>
		<description>GUGLINSKI&#039;S THEORY WILL BE TESTED BY US NAVY


Subject: RE: absence of gamma-rays in your experiment, and neutron’s background
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:29:47 -0700
From: pam.boss@navy.mil
To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com
CC: m_bernstein@acs.org; hestenes@asu.edu; canmarrai@gmail.com
Dear Wladimir,
Like many, we have very few funds and resources. But we will consider your suggestions and see what we can do as time and money permits.
Regards,
Pam



RE: absence of gamma-rays in your experiment, and neutron’s background‏
From: Wladimir Guglinski (wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com)
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 10:35:59 PM
To: PAMELA MOSIER-BOSS (pam.boss@navy.mil)
Bcc: JOHNATHAN CHAN (coldfusion111@gmail.com); jnaudin509@aol.com
Hi, Pamela
Be careful, and take cary.
If all the deuteriuns of the Pd lattice alligned in the same direction get resonance and have fusion at the same time, perhaps it can occur a small explosion in your electrolytic cell.
Also, I recomend you to put a loadstone externally in the cell (like in the Letts-Cravens experiment), in order to help to keep a lot of deuteriuns alligned toward the same direction (that of the external magnetic field applied)
Good luck
WLAD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GUGLINSKI&#8217;S THEORY WILL BE TESTED BY US NAVY</p>
<p>Subject: RE: absence of gamma-rays in your experiment, and neutron’s background<br />
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:29:47 -0700<br />
From: <a href="mailto:pam.boss@navy.mil">pam.boss@navy.mil</a><br />
To: <a href="mailto:wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com">wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com</a><br />
CC: <a href="mailto:m_bernstein@acs.org">m_bernstein@acs.org</a>; <a href="mailto:hestenes@asu.edu">hestenes@asu.edu</a>; <a href="mailto:canmarrai@gmail.com">canmarrai@gmail.com</a><br />
Dear Wladimir,<br />
Like many, we have very few funds and resources. But we will consider your suggestions and see what we can do as time and money permits.<br />
Regards,<br />
Pam</p>
<p>RE: absence of gamma-rays in your experiment, and neutron’s background‏<br />
From: Wladimir Guglinski (wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com)<br />
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 10:35:59 PM<br />
To: PAMELA MOSIER-BOSS (pam.boss@navy.mil)<br />
Bcc: JOHNATHAN CHAN (coldfusion111@gmail.com); <a href="mailto:jnaudin509@aol.com">jnaudin509@aol.com</a><br />
Hi, Pamela<br />
Be careful, and take cary.<br />
If all the deuteriuns of the Pd lattice alligned in the same direction get resonance and have fusion at the same time, perhaps it can occur a small explosion in your electrolytic cell.<br />
Also, I recomend you to put a loadstone externally in the cell (like in the Letts-Cravens experiment), in order to help to keep a lot of deuteriuns alligned toward the same direction (that of the external magnetic field applied)<br />
Good luck<br />
WLAD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHC</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-11155</link>
		<dc:creator>HHC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-11155</guid>
		<description>Wladimir Guglinski,  Your links have colorful graphic illustrations and clear American English explanations.  Thanks, I enjoy learning new concepts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wladimir Guglinski,  Your links have colorful graphic illustrations and clear American English explanations.  Thanks, I enjoy learning new concepts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-11151</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-11151</guid>
		<description>GUGLINSKI&#039;S THEORY ON COLD FUSION CAN BE TESTED


An email was sent to Pamela Mosier-Boss in 11 April 2009, suggesting to use an oscillator in her experiment. 

The email is ahead. 

From: Wladimir Guglinski (wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com)
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 3:46:25 PM
To: pam.boss@navy.mil
Cc: m_bernstein@acs.org; David Hestenes (hestenes@asu.edu); EDEL PONS (canmarrai@gmail.com) 

Dear Pamela 

My theory can be tested by your experiment. 

My idea is to use an oscillator capable to increase the oscillatory motion of the molecules D-D within the Pd lattice, by stimulating the resonance D-D. 

If you succeed to stimulate the resonance D-D , we have to expect a growth in the rate of fusion D-D and also in the rate of neutrons emission by unity of time. 

The oscillator I suggest is the following: 

1- A glass buble is fulfilled by heavy hydrogen (D-D molecules). 

The buble must be placed close to the Pd lattice deposited in the cathode. 

2- Two electrodes are connected inside the buble. 

3- A high voltage is applied to the electrodes, producing an electric discharge that crosses the gas of molecules D-D. 

4- The molecules D-D into the buble are excited, and they emit photons in a frequency which is a sub-multiple of the frequency oscillation of the molecules D-D that fulfill the Pd lattice. 

5- The molecules D-D within the Pd lattice get resonance with the frequency of emission by the D-D molecules into the buble, and the oscillation of D-D within Pd is stimulated to increase its amplitude. 

6- I suppose such stimulation of resonance may increase the velocity of D-D fusion within the Pd lattice. 

A SECOND ALTERNATIVE:
You can use a laser that hits the molecules D-D within the glass buble, instead of using an electrical discharge. 

A THIRD ALTERNATIVE:
The best would be to build a laser which emission is produced by D-D molecules. In such case there is no need to have a glass buble, because the laser would be applied directly to the region of Pd lattice. 

Perhaps you have to try the three alternatives. 

It’s my opinion you should have to try it. 

After all, we are in front to a new Physics, and we have to try any new idea if it makes sense. 

Good luck in your attempt, if you decide to do it. 

Regards 

Wladimir Guglinski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GUGLINSKI&#8217;S THEORY ON COLD FUSION CAN BE TESTED</p>
<p>An email was sent to Pamela Mosier-Boss in 11 April 2009, suggesting to use an oscillator in her experiment. </p>
<p>The email is ahead. </p>
<p>From: Wladimir Guglinski (wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com)<br />
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 3:46:25 PM<br />
To: <a href="mailto:pam.boss@navy.mil">pam.boss@navy.mil</a><br />
Cc: <a href="mailto:m_bernstein@acs.org">m_bernstein@acs.org</a>; David Hestenes (hestenes@asu.edu); EDEL PONS (canmarrai@gmail.com) </p>
<p>Dear Pamela </p>
<p>My theory can be tested by your experiment. </p>
<p>My idea is to use an oscillator capable to increase the oscillatory motion of the molecules D-D within the Pd lattice, by stimulating the resonance D-D. </p>
<p>If you succeed to stimulate the resonance D-D , we have to expect a growth in the rate of fusion D-D and also in the rate of neutrons emission by unity of time. </p>
<p>The oscillator I suggest is the following: </p>
<p>1- A glass buble is fulfilled by heavy hydrogen (D-D molecules). </p>
<p>The buble must be placed close to the Pd lattice deposited in the cathode. </p>
<p>2- Two electrodes are connected inside the buble. </p>
<p>3- A high voltage is applied to the electrodes, producing an electric discharge that crosses the gas of molecules D-D. </p>
<p>4- The molecules D-D into the buble are excited, and they emit photons in a frequency which is a sub-multiple of the frequency oscillation of the molecules D-D that fulfill the Pd lattice. </p>
<p>5- The molecules D-D within the Pd lattice get resonance with the frequency of emission by the D-D molecules into the buble, and the oscillation of D-D within Pd is stimulated to increase its amplitude. </p>
<p>6- I suppose such stimulation of resonance may increase the velocity of D-D fusion within the Pd lattice. </p>
<p>A SECOND ALTERNATIVE:<br />
You can use a laser that hits the molecules D-D within the glass buble, instead of using an electrical discharge. </p>
<p>A THIRD ALTERNATIVE:<br />
The best would be to build a laser which emission is produced by D-D molecules. In such case there is no need to have a glass buble, because the laser would be applied directly to the region of Pd lattice. </p>
<p>Perhaps you have to try the three alternatives. </p>
<p>It’s my opinion you should have to try it. </p>
<p>After all, we are in front to a new Physics, and we have to try any new idea if it makes sense. </p>
<p>Good luck in your attempt, if you decide to do it. </p>
<p>Regards </p>
<p>Wladimir Guglinski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-11036</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-11036</guid>
		<description>Based on the new nuclear model of Quantum Ring Theory, a new theory is proposed to explain the results obtained by Pamela Mosier-Boss cold fusion experiment, published in last March.

See the article in Peswiki:
How zitterbewegung contributes for cold fusion in Pamela Mosier-Boss experiment:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:_How_zitterbewegung_contributes_for_cold_fusion_in_Pamela_Mosier-Boss_experiment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the new nuclear model of Quantum Ring Theory, a new theory is proposed to explain the results obtained by Pamela Mosier-Boss cold fusion experiment, published in last March.</p>
<p>See the article in Peswiki:<br />
How zitterbewegung contributes for cold fusion in Pamela Mosier-Boss experiment:<br />
<a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:_How_zitterbewegung_contributes_for_cold_fusion_in_Pamela_Mosier-Boss_experiment" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:_How_zitterbewegung_contributes_for_cold_fusion_in_Pamela_Mosier-Boss_experiment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-10990</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-10990</guid>
		<description>Watcher wrote:

&quot;What I want to know is how does changing the zbw change the rest of quantum physics. Does this unravel the rest of the hypothesis? It seems like changing one portion of a theory just to fit a chemists perspective of what they’re looking for is not necessarily something you want to do to make a living in scientific research. &quot;

No, Watcher,
zbw interpreted in the sence of Schrodinger (as a helical trajectory) brings many other solutions for Theoretical Physics.
According to Schrodinger, zbw would be responsible for the spin and magnetic moment of the electron

The electron has a spin 1/2.
But when captured by a proton, the electron loses its zbw, and it loses its spin, becoming a boson.
So, by this way the model of neutron formed by proton+electron becomes theoretically possible, because such neutron with structure n=p+e has spin 1/2, as required from Fermi-Dirac statistics.

And from such a model of neutron n=p+e we can explain some theoretical questions concerning cold fusion, which is impossible to explain from the current model of neutron of Standard Model in Particle Physcis.


Quantum Ring Theory also proposes a new hydrogen atom in which an electron moves with zbw along the proton, and such new hydrogen atom solve paradoxes that cannot be solved by the current hydrogen atom of Quantum Mechanics.

For instance, it explains the paradox of the successes of Bohr:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Successes_of_the_Bohr_atom


Such new model of hydrogen atom conciliates the Bohr theory of hydrogen atom with the Schrodinger Equations, and by this way it is eliminated from the Physics the paradoxical and undesirable Bohr&#039;s Principle of Complementarity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watcher wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;What I want to know is how does changing the zbw change the rest of quantum physics. Does this unravel the rest of the hypothesis? It seems like changing one portion of a theory just to fit a chemists perspective of what they’re looking for is not necessarily something you want to do to make a living in scientific research. &#8221;</p>
<p>No, Watcher,<br />
zbw interpreted in the sence of Schrodinger (as a helical trajectory) brings many other solutions for Theoretical Physics.<br />
According to Schrodinger, zbw would be responsible for the spin and magnetic moment of the electron</p>
<p>The electron has a spin 1/2.<br />
But when captured by a proton, the electron loses its zbw, and it loses its spin, becoming a boson.<br />
So, by this way the model of neutron formed by proton+electron becomes theoretically possible, because such neutron with structure n=p+e has spin 1/2, as required from Fermi-Dirac statistics.</p>
<p>And from such a model of neutron n=p+e we can explain some theoretical questions concerning cold fusion, which is impossible to explain from the current model of neutron of Standard Model in Particle Physcis.</p>
<p>Quantum Ring Theory also proposes a new hydrogen atom in which an electron moves with zbw along the proton, and such new hydrogen atom solve paradoxes that cannot be solved by the current hydrogen atom of Quantum Mechanics.</p>
<p>For instance, it explains the paradox of the successes of Bohr:<br />
<a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Successes_of_the_Bohr_atom" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Successes_of_the_Bohr_atom</a></p>
<p>Such new model of hydrogen atom conciliates the Bohr theory of hydrogen atom with the Schrodinger Equations, and by this way it is eliminated from the Physics the paradoxical and undesirable Bohr&#8217;s Principle of Complementarity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-10989</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-10989</guid>
		<description>Zbw is the explanation for cold fusion experiments where an electron is captured by a proton and they form a neutron at low energy, as happens in the Conte-Pieralice experiment, and Don Borghi experiment:

C. Borghi, C. Giori, A.A. Dall’Ollio, Experimental Evidence of Emission of Neutrons from Cold Hydrogen Plasma, American Institute of Physics (Phys. At. Nucl.), vol 56, no 7, 1993.

E. Conte, M. Pieralice, An Experiment Indicates the Nuclear Fusion of the Proton and Electron into a Neutron, Infinite Energy, Vol 4, No. 23, 1999, pg 67.




Other cold fusion experiments require other sort of explanations:


http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom


http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Foundations_for_Cold_Fusion


http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Cold_Fusion_and_Gamow%27s_Paradox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zbw is the explanation for cold fusion experiments where an electron is captured by a proton and they form a neutron at low energy, as happens in the Conte-Pieralice experiment, and Don Borghi experiment:</p>
<p>C. Borghi, C. Giori, A.A. Dall’Ollio, Experimental Evidence of Emission of Neutrons from Cold Hydrogen Plasma, American Institute of Physics (Phys. At. Nucl.), vol 56, no 7, 1993.</p>
<p>E. Conte, M. Pieralice, An Experiment Indicates the Nuclear Fusion of the Proton and Electron into a Neutron, Infinite Energy, Vol 4, No. 23, 1999, pg 67.</p>
<p>Other cold fusion experiments require other sort of explanations:</p>
<p><a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom</a></p>
<p><a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Foundations_for_Cold_Fusion" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Foundations_for_Cold_Fusion</a></p>
<p><a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Cold_Fusion_and_Gamow%27s_Paradox" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Cold_Fusion_and_Gamow%27s_Paradox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-10988</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-10988</guid>
		<description>Zbw is the explanation for cold fusion experiments where an electron is captured by a proton and they form a neutron at low energy, as happens in the Conte-Pieralice experiment, and Don Borghi experiment:

C. Borghi, C. Giori, A.A. Dall’Ollio, Experimental Evidence of Emission of Neutrons from Cold Hydrogen Plasma, American Institute of Physics (Phys. At. Nucl.), vol 56, no 7, 1993.

E. Conte, M. Pieralice, An Experiment Indicates the Nuclear Fusion of the Proton and Electron into a Neutron, Infinite Energy, Vol 4, No. 23, 1999, pg 67.




Other cold fusion experiments require other sort of explanations:

http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom

http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_Fusion_Theories

http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Foundations_for_Cold_Fusion

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Cold_Fusion_and_Gamow%27s_Paradox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zbw is the explanation for cold fusion experiments where an electron is captured by a proton and they form a neutron at low energy, as happens in the Conte-Pieralice experiment, and Don Borghi experiment:</p>
<p>C. Borghi, C. Giori, A.A. Dall’Ollio, Experimental Evidence of Emission of Neutrons from Cold Hydrogen Plasma, American Institute of Physics (Phys. At. Nucl.), vol 56, no 7, 1993.</p>
<p>E. Conte, M. Pieralice, An Experiment Indicates the Nuclear Fusion of the Proton and Electron into a Neutron, Infinite Energy, Vol 4, No. 23, 1999, pg 67.</p>
<p>Other cold fusion experiments require other sort of explanations:</p>
<p><a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom</a></p>
<p><a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_Fusion_Theories" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_Fusion_Theories</a></p>
<p><a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Foundations_for_Cold_Fusion" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Foundations_for_Cold_Fusion</a></p>
<p><a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Cold_Fusion_and_Gamow%27s_Paradox" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Cold_Fusion_and_Gamow%27s_Paradox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-10986</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-10986</guid>
		<description>Wather wrote:
&quot;Could someone help me understand the zbw’s role in the foundation of quantum physics?&quot;


The Zitterbewegung Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
David Hestenes, Foundations of Physics, V. 20, No. 10, (1990), 1213-1232</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wather wrote:<br />
&#8220;Could someone help me understand the zbw’s role in the foundation of quantum physics?&#8221;</p>
<p>The Zitterbewegung Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics<br />
David Hestenes, Foundations of Physics, V. 20, No. 10, (1990), 1213-1232</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.GUGLINSKI</title>
		<link>http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/cold-fusion-after-20-years/comment-page-3/#comment-10985</link>
		<dc:creator>W.GUGLINSKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=502#comment-10985</guid>
		<description>Wather wrote:
&quot;Could someone help me understand the zbw’s role in the foundation of quantum physics?&quot;


The Zitterbewegung Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
David Hestenes, Foundations of Physics, V. 20, No. 10, (1990), 1213-1232
http://modelingnts.la.asu.edu/pdf/ZBW_I_QM.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wather wrote:<br />
&#8220;Could someone help me understand the zbw’s role in the foundation of quantum physics?&#8221;</p>
<p>The Zitterbewegung Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics<br />
David Hestenes, Foundations of Physics, V. 20, No. 10, (1990), 1213-1232<br />
<a href="http://modelingnts.la.asu.edu/pdf/ZBW_I_QM.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://modelingnts.la.asu.edu/pdf/ZBW_I_QM.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
